Turns out we’re already living in a surveillance state.

The new FISA “compromise” bill that the Senate is about to pass makes me angry just to think about, but deep down I’ve long suspected that our government pretty much spies on us with impunity already. This Baltimore Sun news article pretty much confirms that suspicion:

“There’s virtually no branch of the U.S. government that isn’t in some way involved in monitoring or surveillance,” said Matthew Aid, an intelligence historian and fellow at the National Security Archives at The George Washington University. “We’re operating in a brave new world.”

[…] The Bush administration argues that the privacy and civil liberties protections in place for surveillance not covered by the FISA rules are “unprecedented.” In addition to the data-mining, use of financial transaction databases and satellite imagery, the surveillance includes monitoring the travel patterns of airline passengers.

[…] But critics say the safeguards don’t always work. Some blunders in the use of such protections have become public. New Yorker writer Lawrence Wright wrote in January about one such experience. In 2002, while he was researching The Looming Tower, his Pulitzer Prize-winning book on al-Qaida, two members of an FBI terrorism task force arrived at his home. Why, they asked, had his daughter been speaking with someone in the United Kingdom who was in touch with suspected al-Qaida operatives?

It wasn’t his daughter, he told them flatly. Wright himself had made the calls. And the person he contacted was a British civil rights lawyer who had asked him not to speak with her clients, some of whom are relatives of Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s chief lieutenant.

“My daughter is no terrorist – she went to high school with the Bush twins,” Wright said. “I was taken aback. They were apparently monitoring my phones.”

Wright said he was particularly surprised because he was aware of protections supposedly in place to conceal his name and other identifying information that would have been gathered during the creation of transcripts of the call.

Wright said he doubted the government would have been able to get a warrant for the information, and he said he didn’t know how the FBI obtained his daughter’s name, let alone got the impression that she was communicating with the British lawyer.

It’s somewhat ironic to note that the new FISA bill actually has more civil liberties protections than the other domestic spying programs that aren’t covered by it. It makes me feel foolish for getting so worked up about the new FISA rules because, really, the cows got out of the barn a long time ago. There’s been reports of various abuses and misuses of these programs for years now and every time a government agency gets new powers, such as the FBI and its “security letters” thanks to the Patriot Act, it’s usually not too long before we hear about them being abused. If anything I suppose I should be angry that the new FISA bill provides the government with even more power it can abuse, not that they haven’t abused the system under the old rules already. They’re just trying to make it quasi-legal to do so now that everyone knows about it.

3 thoughts on “Turns out we’re already living in a surveillance state.

  1. It’s odd how many people get wound up about state spying, completely forgetting the amount of data private business keeps on us all.  Your credit card company possibly knows more about the average person than the government.  Your ISP knows everything you do online.  No matter how wrong a western government’s actions, it is doing it out of some mis-shapen sense of community- big business just wants to own you. (Just the other day I was watching a report on estate agents- one practice is to get credit reports on buyers, so they squeeze every last drop out of them)

  2. Oh well, I wasn’t really using that right to privacy.  At least the government isn’t using me for radiation experiments or anything like that.

    And LH, I don’t follow your logic about the government not being as bad as big business.  Isn’t your government pretty much controlled by big business too? Everyday it seems we have more and more laws passed that benefit big business exclusively over the rights of the individual.  I think it’s really getting tough to tell them apart.

  3. The German term Politikverdrossenheit comes to mind.

    It roughly translates to being fed up with politics as it’s being practiced, politicians in general, and losing interest in participating in the electorial process for the lack of representation.

    Why bother voting in November? The choice is between a a repugnant party and a continuation of the disastrous policies of the current administration or a party that actively aids and abets these policies despite having the public mandate and majority to oppose it—and does anybody believe they’ll return the civil liberties they’ve been busy signing away?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.