TiVo owners feeling uneasy after Super Bowl.

Seems the implications of TiVo’s headline making report on Janet’s flash dance being the most watched part of the Super Bowl I mentioned the other day has hit home with some TiVo owners.

TiVo watchers uneasy after post-Super Bowl reports | CNET News.com

TiVo said users had watched the skin-baring incident nearly three times more than any other moment during the Super Bowl broadcast, sparking headlines that dramatically publicized the power of the company’s longstanding data-gathering practices.

“It’s just sort of creepy,” longtime TiVo subscriber Sandra Munozshe wrote in an e-mail to CNET News.com.

“Make no mistake, I do clearly love the box,” engineer and longtime TiVo user Jerrell Wilson wrote in an e-mail to CNET News.com. “I have been a tireless sales rep with all my friends. I should be on commission from TiVo. Thus arises the most severe form of anger: that deriving from a perceived betrayal of trust.”

Seems some TiVo owners weren’t aware of just how detailed the data collected on their viewing habits really is. Seems the granularity of it is pretty fine:

So what information does TiVo collect about its viewers? The company can indeed tell what has been watched on a particular TiVo box, down to the second, including the number of times a moment was rewound and played again, or a commercial was skipped.

The information is transmitted back to TiVo headquarters in Alviso, Calif., via the same phone line used to download show schedules to the DVR inside a home. The information itself is used to automatically suggest which shows a viewer would like, based on previous selections.

But for all the granularity involved in tracking viewing habits, TiVo said there’s nothing personal attached to the resulting data, as promised in its subscriber privacy policy.

“There is no demographic information sent back to TiVo,” Sutherland said. “TiVo doesn’t know any of that.”

Which isn’t to say that it couldn’t as that’s entirely possible, just that TiVo doesn’t attach demographic information to the data collected at this time.

While conceivably, TiVo could investigate an individual’s viewing habits, it doesn’t, a spokesman said. But it does occasionally mine data from a random sampling of 20,000 homes viewing a particular program, as it did during the Super Bowl.

“I can understand people’s concerns,” said spokesman Scott Sutherland. “But when weighted against reality, they are unfounded.”

It really does come down to how much you trust the folks at TiVo to stay true to their privacy policy. Especially now that they’ve signed an agreement with Nielsen Media Research to provide them with information on TiVo user’s viewing habits.

Lee Tien, lead staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization concerned with online privacy and other issues, gave TiVo high marks overall for guarding its customers’ personal data. But Tien said the deal with Nielsen pushes the envelope, because it threatens to remove the anonymity from the data collected. “So long as they are only selling anonymized data, then the privacy issues are not at all that great,” he said.

As long as folks know what they’re signing up for then there really isn’t a problem, but it’s clear a lot of folks don’t realize what is being tracked or the level of detail. To their credit TiVo does offer an 800 number you can call to opt-out of the data collection, but even that isn’t clear to a number of their subscribers.

5 thoughts on “TiVo owners feeling uneasy after Super Bowl.

  1. OK…. then add the Patriot Act into the mix and you have to wonder if what you watch someday might be of “national security importance” just like what books you check out of the library.


  2. Exactly, QM. Amend ‘…comes down to how much you trust the folks at TiVo…’ to say ‘… at TiVo, the Government, the police, the courts, the enforcement of the patriot act, those in charge of network security at TiVo, the hackers on the internet…’

    When I worked on the library board for my small town, it was common practice to anonymize book sign-out records once the book was returned in good condition. We knew who had what books while they had them signed out (of course), but once they were returned all we kept was generic “population data” broken down by child/adult/senior so that we could make book purchases based on what the community was reading.

    If someone wanted your personal book viewing habits from us, they couldn’t have them because we didn’t know them and couldn’t “combine data” to find them. Search warrant or not. We even did data overwrites that were pretty forward thinking for the time (not robust enough by today’s standards)…

    That was a concious choice on the part of the library board, and a choice we were quite proud of.

  3. This is surely and act of TERROR! A breast running amuck on live television! Three things I remember clearly, where I was when Ronald Raygunz got shot, where I was when the twin towers came down, and where I was when that breast destroyed America! God help us all!!!

  4. …isn’t there something about “The four breast-men of the apocalypse”? I’m sure I’ve heard that somewhere. The end of the world is nigh!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.